O
Cleveland Heights
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

ADU Zoning Amendments

Cleveland Heights

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)Opposed (3)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
12
Last 30 days
12

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 15, 2026.

Public comments (12)

SupportiveRobin KaltenbachOct 15, 2026

AARP Ohio's associate state director voiced strong support, citing caregiver needs and surveys showing most Ohioans 45+ want to age in their homes.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 25:22 →
MixedJeffrey TalbertOct 15, 2026

Asked for a dedicated off-street parking space per ADU and a 60-day minimum lease, arguing future tenants will have cars even if grandma doesn't.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 28:24 →
SupportiveCynthia TrataOct 15, 2026

Longtime supporter from South Overlook Road urged quick passage, noting construction costs have risen from $140,000 toward $200,000.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 32:09 →
SupportiveJames O'HareOct 15, 2026

Urged passage so homeowners can proceed with confidence, cited University Heights examples, and asked council to consider tax abatements for ADU builders.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 33:34 →
MixedKirk SchminkOct 15, 2026

Supports ADUs generally but strongly opposes the conditional use permit requirement, citing population decline and arguing by-right approval sends the right signal.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 37:55 →
MixedLou RadavoyevichOct 15, 2026

Supports the ordinance and the conditional use process, but questioned why short-term rentals were banned and asked staff to consult merchants.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 40:35 →
SupportiveVince ReddyOct 15, 2026

Strongly supports ADUs in his small-lot Greater Randolph neighborhood, backs the owner-occupancy requirement and no parking mandate, but echoed concerns about the conditional use requirement.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 43:02 →
OpposedDrusilla RobertsonOct 15, 2026

Opposed, citing parking, sewers, weak enforcement, loss of backyard privacy, wildlife, and green space in Forest Hill's 980 attached-garage homes.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 45:25 →
OpposedChristine HegeOct 15, 2026

Urged caution, warning about density in historic neighborhoods, enforcement of owner-occupancy, school and utility demands, and green space loss.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 49:01 →
OpposedDeborah WillisOct 15, 2026

Opposed, citing her bad experience living next to a converted property and saying she has no confidence the city will enforce noise and nuisance rules.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 52:34 →
ConcernedSheraldine DavisOct 15, 2026

Asked about occupancy limits for ADUs and whether guests could effectively become additional tenants.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 59:40 →
SupportiveRay ReedOct 15, 2026

Strongly supports ADUs for aging in place with his blended family of ten children, and cited hospital workers needing short-term housing nearby.

Planning and Development Committee of Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 1:01:37 →